RE: [PECL-DEV] building php_inclued_dll / unresolved external symbol _executor_globals
| From: | GE Capital, consultant) | Date: | Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:24:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PECL-DEV] building php_inclued_dll / unresolved external symbol _executor_globals | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-7466@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com]
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Neuhauser, Roman (GE Capital,
> consultant) <Roman.Neuhauser@ge.com> wrote:
>
> >> > configure --disable-all --disable-zts --enable-cli
> >> --enable-inclued=shared
> >>
> >> Now I'm confused, do you want it static or shared?
> >
> > what about the configure command line confuses you? i thought i was quite clear:
>
> You said you like to have it static, but you configure it shared.
i wrote (and quoted it again in the previous email, but you snipped it):
> > i'm trying to build php_inclued.dll. i've concocted a config.w32
> > file (see below) which allows the extension to build statically,
> > but the dll build bombs
english is my second language, which probably explains why i'm surprised
that this sentence could mean that i *want* a static build. i thought i was
just mentioning that the static version is ok to document that the breakage
is limited to the shared build. sorry for the confusion.