Re: Releasing win32service
| From: | Christopher Jones | Date: | Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:57:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Releasing win32service | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-8060@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 03/15/2011 09:43 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
With regard to the package.xml file, what value should I put in for <pearinstaller><min> What impact does the value have for a pecl extension?If you're using the package.xml 2.0 format (recommended), then you need PEAR 1.4 onwards. OCI8's package.xml has: <pearinstaller>
<min>1.4.0b1</min></pearinstaller> and I've seen no reason to fiddle with it. I see other package.xml files use plain 1.4.0. I have a note that early? PHP 5.2 used PEAR 1.7.2. Some references on the package.xml format are - http://devzone.zend.com/article/1051-PEAR-and-PECL-Packaging - http://pear.php.net/manual/en/guide-developers.php
http://pear.php.net/manual/en/guide.developers.package2.phpChris -- Email: christopher.jones@oracle.com Tel: +1 650 506 8630 Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/