Re: Re: [PECL-DEV] We have written an optimizer extension for PHP
| From: | angela.song | Date: | Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:52:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PECL-DEV] We have written an optimizer extension for PHP | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pecl.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-8953@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
hi~
It's glad to receive your letter.
The memcache is based on the TCP protocol, but our ConstCache use the way of shared memory. They are
just the API similar, so the two code bases could not be merged together.
And thank you for pointing out my negligence ,I have put the constcache.ini in English~ :)
2011-12-08
Angela Song
发件人: Christopher Jones
发送时间: 2011-12-08 03:12:09
收件人: pecl-dev; angela.song
抄送:
主题: Re: [PECL-DEV] We have written an optimizer extension for PHP
On 12/06/2011 08:52 PM, angela.song wrote:
> This extension named ConstCache is an optimizer extension for PHP by
> C language. It imitates the API of Memcache, and adds some
> additional methods. In order to being beneficial to performance
> optimize, it uses small storage granularity and the way of sharing
> memory to store data and the data will never be deleted(can be clear
> all).
Hi,
If the licensing is OK, generally the PECL community accepts new
extensions quickly. But you might have to prod and poke until someone
has time to give you access.
If the API is so similar to the current memcache API, is there no way
that the two code bases could be merged together, allowing either
backend storage mechanism to be chosen via a configurable setting?
Would it be possible to put the constcache.ini comments in English,
like is done in the doc?
Out of interest, how does the performance compare versus anything
else?
By the way, the phrase "optimizer extension" indicates it optimizes
code execution like http://pecl.php.net/package/optimizer Perhaps
another description for your code would be better?
Chris
--
Email: christopher.jones@oracle.com
Tel: +1 650 506 8630
Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/