Re: Dom XML testing (Was: Re: [PHP-QA] 2002-01-03 CVS CommitLog Commentary)
| From: | Joey Smith | Date: | Sun, 13 Jan 2002 10:33:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Dom XML testing (Was: Re: [PHP-QA] 2002-01-03 CVS CommitLog Commentary) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-4305@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Well, I *USED* to be both testing it and fixing it, and if my job will
ever settle down a bit, I'll be back on it. I'm also using it on a
deployed application, so bugs show up pretty quick. There are several I
know about, and even have partial patches for, but I don't have time to
finish it up yet...
Anyways, just my $.02
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Markus Fischer wrote the following to php-qa@lists.php.net :
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 08:03:48PM -0700, Zak Greant wrote :
> > + * ext/domxml/php_domxml.c:
> > + - domxml_node_add_child(): Perform deep copy before adding child to
> > prevent
> > + double memory freeing.
> >
> > domxml has seen a significant number of fixes in the last several weeks,
> > we should try to test it specially as well.
>
> You should take Zak's work like gods command. Most of domxml
> functions aren't properly tested. Some segfault, some don't
> work, etc. I only no one guy really using it and doing tests
> (waves to chregu) and I'm wondering if that represents the
> userbase of domxml? Hm.
>
>