Re: cvs: php-benchmarks /benchcli/tests test_whirl.php /benchcli/tests/phpWhirl 99bottles.wr AUTHORS COPYING keymaker.wr whirl.php
/benchcli/tests/phpWhirl/classes WhirlMathRing.php WhirlMemory.php WhirlOpsRing.php WhirlParser.php WhirlRing.

From: Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:32:51 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: php-benchmarks /benchcli/tests test_whirl.php /benchcli/tests/phpWhirl 99bottles.wr AUTHORS COPYING keymaker.wr whirl.php
/benchcli/tests/phpWhirl/classes WhirlMathRing.php WhirlMemory.php WhirlOpsRing.php WhirlParser.php WhirlRing.
Groups: php.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to php-qa+get-65054@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
This benchmark, when running parsing keymaker.wr, takes pretty long time for me (about 1 minute on a slow machine). If I run 99bottles instead, which is a smaller program, it takes about 10 seconds instead. Is 1 minute acceptable or should we go for the other, 99bottles? On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Alexander Hjalmarsson <hjalle@php.net>wrote: > hjalle Tue Jun 2 13:19:40 2009 UTC > > Added files: > /php-benchmarks/benchcli/tests test_whirl.php > /php-benchmarks/benchcli/tests/phpWhirl 99bottles.wr AUTHORS > COPYING keymaker.wr > whirl.php > /php-benchmarks/benchcli/tests/phpWhirl/classes WhirlMathRing.php > WhirlMemory.php > WhirlOpsRing.php > WhirlParser.php > WhirlRing.php > Log: > Whirl parser test > > > -- > PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >

« previous php.qa (#65054) next »