Re: PHP 5.3.1RC1 Testing
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:20:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP 5.3.1RC1 Testing | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.qa php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-65380@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ah, I did not see you comment after the test results list. Then
everything is fine :)
Thanks for testing!
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > My *pear-core* test results...
>>
>> Report them to pear and see what are the reasons? Or if there are
>> regressions between 5.3.0 and 5.3.1?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Pierre
>>
>> http://blog.thepimp.net |
>> http://www.libgd.org
>
>
> Hey Pierre,
>
> My intention is only to indicate that the 5.3.1RC1 results are consistent
> with the 5.3.0 results, aka no regressions. The PEAR guys are aware of the
> test failures themselves, but that's not the point of my testing. I only
> wanted to show that I've done said testing against 5.3.1RC1 and indicate
> confidence in it. Since I started paying closer attention to the RC
> releases, I've not seen anything on the pear-qa ML to confirm that they're
> being tested for regressions with PEAR. That's why I've begun to do so
> myself.
> --
> CRB
>
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org