Re: PHP 5.3.1RC1 Testing

From: Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:20:08 +0000
Subject: Re: PHP 5.3.1RC1 Testing
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.qa php.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to php-qa+get-65380@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
ah, I did not see you comment after the test results list. Then everything is fine :) Thanks for testing! On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > My *pear-core* test results... >> >> Report them to pear and see what are the reasons? Or if there are >> regressions between 5.3.0 and 5.3.1? >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Pierre >> >> http://blog.thepimp.net | >> http://www.libgd.org > > > Hey Pierre, > > My intention is only to indicate that the 5.3.1RC1 results are consistent > with the 5.3.0 results, aka no regressions.  The PEAR guys are aware of the > test failures themselves, but that's not the point of my testing.  I only > wanted to show that I've done said testing against 5.3.1RC1 and indicate > confidence in it.  Since I started paying closer attention to the RC > releases, I've not seen anything on the pear-qa ML to confirm that they're > being tested for regressions with PEAR.  That's why I've begun to do so > myself. > -- > CRB > -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.qa (#65380) next »