Fw: failure notice

From: Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 03:06:45 +0000
Subject: Fw: failure notice
Groups: php.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to php-qa+get-94@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Grrrr. I Bcc: a couple lists to avoid spam-cascade and get bounced. > For reasons known only to Bill Gates, $path_info and $SCRIPT_NAME behave > differently under various configurations of Windows. The differences and > their prerequesite conditions should be QA'd and/or documented. > > Apologies for the Bcc: to php-qa and phpdoc, but it seemed like the way to > go to get this idea to all interested without generating spam... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Hojtsy Gabor <hgoba@freemail.c3.hu> > To: PHP DOC Lista <phpdoc@lists.php.net> > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 6:41 AM > Subject: [PHP-DOC] SCRIPT_NAME > > > Hello! > > I'm not shouting... :) You know that I am now testing some > good things in the docs, and post my problems here. > > Now I found that SCRIPT_NAME is not useful for the task > as it is documented. The doc says: > > =================================================== > SCRIPT_NAME > Contains the current script's path. This is > useful for pages which need to point to themselves. > =================================================== > > I am using 3.0.16 and Win Apache, and I alway get back > /php3/php.exe. I think PATH_INFO is the variable > useful to get this info. But it is even not on the > list of Apache variables in predefined variables... > > Hi, > Hojtsy Gabor (Goba) > _____________________________________________________________________ > The starting-point for hungarian webmasters - http://weblabor.hu/�I'3 > ì ´÷«ç^ç > PHP Manual hungarian translation [under const.] - > http://weblabor.hu/php/

« previous php.qa (#94) next »