Fw: failure notice
| From: | Richard Lynch | Date: | Tue, 04 Jul 2000 03:06:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Fw: failure notice | ||
| Groups: | php.qa | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-qa+get-94@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Grrrr. I Bcc: a couple lists to avoid spam-cascade and get bounced.
> For reasons known only to Bill Gates, $path_info and $SCRIPT_NAME behave
> differently under various configurations of Windows. The differences and
> their prerequesite conditions should be QA'd and/or documented.
>
> Apologies for the Bcc: to php-qa and phpdoc, but it seemed like the way to
> go to get this idea to all interested without generating spam...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Hojtsy Gabor <hgoba@freemail.c3.hu>
> To: PHP DOC Lista <phpdoc@lists.php.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 6:41 AM
> Subject: [PHP-DOC] SCRIPT_NAME
>
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm not shouting... :) You know that I am now testing some
> good things in the docs, and post my problems here.
>
> Now I found that SCRIPT_NAME is not useful for the task
> as it is documented. The doc says:
>
> ===================================================
> SCRIPT_NAME
> Contains the current script's path. This is
> useful for pages which need to point to themselves.
> ===================================================
>
> I am using 3.0.16 and Win Apache, and I alway get back
> /php3/php.exe. I think PATH_INFO is the variable
> useful to get this info. But it is even not on the
> list of Apache variables in predefined variables...
>
> Hi,
> Hojtsy Gabor (Goba)
> _____________________________________________________________________
> The starting-point for hungarian webmasters - http://weblabor.hu/�I'3
> ì
´÷«ç^ç
> PHP Manual hungarian translation [under const.] -
> http://weblabor.hu/php/