Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: constants and cycle

I don't consider it a backward compatability problem since it has never been in a stable release. That is what RCs are for, to work these kinks out. Whatever we do will be detailed in the manual. I will change the syntax and commit it. If there are any strong objections, we'll deal with those as they come. I assume that the backticks themselves are OK, I didn't see a viable alternative that was any better. Monte On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 16:57, Tom Sommer wrote: > On 04 Apr 2003 16:43:16 -0600, Monte Ohrt wrote: > > > well $foo[][] synatax is now OK in embedded quotes without backtics, but > > the inner workings of the syntax did not change. $foo.bar is still an > > associative array reference, not $foo['bar']. > > I am seriously recommending the $x.y method :) > I know it will break BC, but since it's an RC release people can live with > it > > in the long run it makes more since to name backtrics common escape-chars, > not just escapes from $vars... and as I mentioned it's many times more > logical... > > The downside is that php.smarty.general will get flooded with questions > about this... unless it is clearly stated in the release :) > > Did I mention it was more logical compared to other programming languages? > Did i? :) > -- > Tom Sommer, Denmark > www.tsn.dk - www.dreamcoder.dk -- Monte Ohrt <monte@ispi.net>