Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: backtic syntax changed

I don't think we want to use backticks as a replacement to curly braces. _if_ we wanted to add eval functionality to things like assign() or config_load(), then we should stick with the {$foo} syntax, and not introduce things like $foo for the same purpose. Monte On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 15:43, Tom Sommer wrote: > On 07 Apr 2003 15:20:01 -0500, Monte Ohrt wrote: > > > Well it would work there too, they are the same function. > > Ok then, > > I still think these backtrics could prove extremely useful for smarty, if > they were to behave like described in my first post > > -- > Tom Sommer, Denmark > www.tsn.dk - www.dreamcoder.dk -- Monte Ohrt <monte@ispi.net>