Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Is Smarty using PHP output buffering?
| From: | messju mohr | Date: | Wed, 07 May 2003 13:00:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Is Smarty using PHP output buffering? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.smarty.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-smarty-dev+get-1401@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:05:03AM -0300, luis wrote:
> I see some of you disagree with enabling OB for display(). For this an
> backwards-semantic-compatibility I think that the best option is to
> provide a switch to use or not use OB in display defalting to no (what
> previous versions used).
> Would you agree with this switch.
> Something simple: $smarty->display_output_buffering = true;
> Monte?
why not
ob_start();
$smarty->display()...
ob_end_flush();
???
or overload display():
class Smarty_Buffy {
function display($tpl_file, $cache_id = null, $compile_id = null) {
ob_start();
parent::display($tpl_file, $cache_id = null, $compile_id = null);
ob_end_flush();
}
}
there's no need for explicit output-buffering in smarty IMHO.
greetings
messju
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: boots [mailto:jayboots@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 6:57 PM
> > To: luis; 'Smarty Dev'
> > Cc: 'Smarty Dev'
> > Subject: RE: [SMARTY-DEV] Is Smarty using PHP output buffering?
> >
> >
> > Luis wrote:
> > > IMHO smarty should default to the most efficient option
> >
> > I see your point. I think the issue is that "the most
> > efficient option" is really something that only the
> > application designer / site manager can decide, and that only
> > with some patience and trial and error. I don't think there
> > is a magic setting that is the most efficient in all cases.
> > Therefore, a conservative approach is nice--default to the
> > fastest/best options that won't cause extra overhead on the
> > majority of systems. Most systems are probably employing
> > techniques that obviate the need for automatic OB.
> >
> > I like Tom's suggestion of providing more reference material
> > to those trying to optimize Smarty's performance.
> >
> > But you do have a good point: out-of-the-box, Smarty should
> > try to be as fast as possible--as long as it doesn't become a
> > resource hog to do it, that is.
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> > http://search.yahoo.com
> >
> > --
> > Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
>
>
> --
> Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php