Re: var renaming, speed testing and no-cache

On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 16:11, boots wrote: > I don't want to rain on the parade, but much more interesting will be > some benchmarks of long running 2.5.0 pages that invoke many functions, > different includes, etc. Also Monte, are you doing your fetch 1000 > times? Try putting a section with a 1000 iterations so that you do 1000 > includes instead of 1000 fetches -- much more closely related to > real-performance, in my opinion :) Since the abstraction was aimed at speeding up instantiation time, I didn't bother benchmarking internal execution times, those should largely be the same, unless other changes (outside of abstraction) have affected them. Monte