Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: Bugreport: html_image shouldn't use border="0"

If you're careless and just press reply in evolution, they'll end up with you, not the list. Shouldn't the mailer strip off the Reply-To header? Anyway, that's off topic ;) Regards, Ruben -- # ------------------------------ # # Ruben Vermeersch # # E-mail: ruben@Lambda1.be # # Website: http://www.Lambda1.be # # Mobile: +32495338869 # # ------------------------------ # On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 17:57, Muhammed Mamedov wrote: > P.S: in your replies donot forward messages to my personal e-mail. Just mail > it to the list, I read from there via my e-mail client > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "messju mohr" <messju@lammfellpuschen.de> > To: "Muhammed Mamedov" <mm@ytm.com.tr> > Cc: "smarty" <smarty-dev@lists.php.net> > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 6:50 PM > Subject: Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: Bugreport: html_image shouldn't use border="0" > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 06:19:15PM +0200, Muhammed Mamedov wrote: > > > I think that providing extra parameter is nice, if no border parameter > is > > > passed then border will be omitted, but when border="value" is passed it > > > will be set. > > > > That not backwards compatible. Currently if the border-attribute is > > omitted it defaults to '... border="0" ...'. > > > > > I think that adding ne {xhtml_image} is unecesary and confusign, because > > > later we may find such XHTML incompliances with other tags. > > > > And what do we do then? Making them xhtml-compliant and eventually > > breaking html-compliance with that? > > [MUHAMMED] : In my opinion, if say that we won't have such requests in the > future, then introducing border attribute is the best option. > But if we will (I am afraid we will), then we should imlement a new > xhtml_image (and any other tags with xhtml_tagname in the future).. Or maybe > writing a function which will convert passed content into XHTML.... > > > > > > Regards, > > > Muhammed Mamedov > > > turkmenweb.com > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "messju mohr" <messju@lammfellpuschen.de> > > > To: "Rainer Müller" <rainer.mueller@codingfarm.de> > > > Cc: <smarty-dev@lists.php.net> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 5:40 PM > > > Subject: Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: Bugreport: html_image shouldn't use > border="0" > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:47:14AM +0100, Rainer Müller wrote: > > > > > Rainer müller schrieb: > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >currently html_image creates an img tag with the attribute > border="0". > > > This > > > > > >isn't good because in XHTML there is no attribute border for the > img > > > tag. > > > > > >border should not be used by default and should only be enabled > with an > > > > > >extra param border. > > > > > > > > Yes, great. That would break it for everybody who relied on border > > > > defaulting to "0". > > > > > > > > > > > > My suggestion for another solution involves two things: > > > > > > > > - Make html_image handle border=null (that is the null constant for an > > > > unset value as in php) for an undefined border. > > > > > > > > {html_image} will still render border="0" > > > > but > > > > {html_image border=null} will omit the border > > > > > > > > > > > > - For convinience we can add a new plugin {xhtml_image} that loads and > > > > calls {html_image} with all parameters but uses null as default for > > > > border instead of 0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Raim > > > > > Does nodoby noticed that? Or is there nobody interested in valid > html? > > > > > > > > > > Raim > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/) > > > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/) > > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > -- > > Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > >