Re: [SMARTY-DEV] Re: literal and javascript

On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:51:15PM +0000, pete M wrote: > for the application I'm creating - the javascript is in the template then don't use { and } as delimiters. > and a lot of interaction with form elements, would be difficult to code in > .js file !? not necessarily. put the stuff in functions in the .js-file and pass "this" from the on-*-handlers in the html as a parameter to these functions. if you really want the syntax you suggested below, write a simple prefilter that replaces the "*" (or whatever) inside literal-tags by "{/literal}*{literal}". while you're at it, you could even go a little further and look for {javascript}...{/javascript} in your template, replace it with {literal}...{/literal} and only do the backticks-replacement in the {javascript}-blocks. calling the block {literal} and doing *anything* modifying it's contents is really misleading, IMHO. greetings messju > pete > > Ruben Vermeersch wrote: > >Making it impossible to output any code that contains backticks in the > >literal section (php code, shell scripts, ...) > > > >My meaning about javascript: use external scripts, they also save you > >bandwidth, and make your whole site more efficient. > > > >Ruben > > > >On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 13:24, pete M wrote: > > > >>I think some have missed my point. > >>The idea is to use backticks as delimiters within javascript code > >>enclosed between {literal} tags > >> > >>eg------ > >> > >>{literal} > >>function foo{ > >> bar = $some_smarty_variable + 1; > >> if(bar > 0) { > >> bar2 = bar * $some_other_smarty_variable; > >> } > >>{ > >>{/literal} > >> > >>instead of ----- > >> > >> > >>{literal} > >>function foo{ > >> bar = {/literal}$some_smarty_variable{literal} + 1; > >> if(bar > 0) { > >> bar2 = bar * {/literal}$some_other_smarty_variable{literal}; > >> } > >>{ > >> > >>{/literal} > >> > >>just an idea to make the coding easier to code and read > >> > >>pete > >> > >> > >> > >>Messju Mohr wrote: > >> > >>>On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 06:37:00PM +0300, Konstantin A. Pelepelin wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>>could smarty somehow have variables within the {literal} tags eg in > >>>>>Backticks or some "non used" javascript code ? > >>>> > >>>>Please don't! > >>> > >>> > >>>Yes, please don't! > >>> > >>>Literal should do what it's name says: pass the contents through > >>>*literally*. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>JavaScript is the reason why I use alternate Smarty delimiters {{ }}. > >>>>Unfortunately, people used to use default { }. > >>>> > >>>>Konstantin A. Pelepelin > >>>>DTF.RU > > -- > Smarty Development Mailing List (http://smarty.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php