Re: [SMARTY-DEV] tokens as input to modifiers
| From: | boots | Date: | Wed, 07 Jul 2004 22:44:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [SMARTY-DEV] tokens as input to modifiers | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.smarty.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-smarty-dev+get-2456@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> --- messju mohr <messju@lammfellpuschen.de> wrote:
> > i think it's intended. "null" or "true" could be registered
> > functions which makes the above valid syntax. allowing "null" and
> > "true" as constants would make it ambiguous.
Sorry for the multiple emails, but I just had another thought. Where is
the logic in allowing function plugin names that are already used as
tokens within the parser? Particularly for things like "null", "true",
etc ?
xo boots