Re: [SMARTY-DEV] compiler-block functions (again, sorry)

On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, M Mohr wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:00:38AM -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > > I would do it this way, but rather provide a stack, similar to block > > functions, so that you can inspect it to see what functions enclose > > youru current one. > > yes. the stack is also useful to be able to acces the $tag_args, that > where passed to the block when opening it, on the closing side. > > i just wanted to make it as simple as possible in the first place. i > thougt if i minimize the implications that come with it, i raise the > chance you accept my patch :) > > for now the compiler-plugins have to maintain their own stack(s). > i will have a look, if i could bring this inside > _compile_compiler_tag(). Just copy it from block functions, omitting irrelevant details, of course. -Andrei http://www.gravitonic.com/ "Then again, E=mc^2 may only be a local phenomenon." -- Einstein