RE: [SOAP] Testers for 0.7.5 needed
| From: | Alok K. Dhir | Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:31:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [SOAP] Testers for 0.7.5 needed | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.soap |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-soap+get-815@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Oh I understood - I was just trying to get Arnaud pointed in the right
direction. I'll let you know if I figure out what's killing the
interpreter...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Schlossnagle [mailto:george@omniti.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:11 PM
> To: Alok K. Dhir
> Cc: 'Arnaud Limbourg'; 'SOAP'
> Subject: Re: [SOAP] Testers for 0.7.5 needed
>
>
> You misunderstand. Nothing you do in a user script should be able to
> segv the interpreter. So this is a bug in PHP, not in SOAP. I was
> wondering if anyone tacked it down to a specific bug. Might make
> finding a workaround/permanent fix easier.
>
> George
>
> On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Alok K. Dhir wrote:
>
> > The problem is more likely in the handling of the SOAP_Fault return
> > object.
> > I am able to instantiate SOAP_Fault object all day long with nary a
> > hiccup
> > in the server. It's somewhere in Server.php if I had to guess...
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Arnaud Limbourg [mailto:arnaud.limbourg@club-internet.fr]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:10 PM
> >> To: George Schlossnagle
> >> Cc: Alok K. Dhir; 'SOAP'
> >> Subject: Re: [SOAP] Testers for 0.7.5 needed
> >>
> >>
> >>> What (php) bug is this tickling, ya think?
> >>
> >> Somebody sent me a patch changing an unset statement to
> >> assigning null value.
>
>