Re: [SOAP] Which SOAP ..

The only issue with relying on Curl for transport is that the php module hasn't implemented support for persistent connections last i checked. (maybe in php5 tree it has?) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shane Caraveo" <shane@caraveo.com> To: "Chris Coe" <info@intelligentstreaming.com> Cc: <soap@lists.php.net> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: Re: [SOAP] Which SOAP .. > Chris Coe wrote: > > > At 07:23 21/08/2003, Rudi Starcevic wrote: > > > > My take on this is that I am sure we would all prefer a C or other > > non-script based library for SOAP, for performance reasons on heavy > > load web sites/services. I also believe that it would make it a > > little easier to get more widespread acceptance for PHP as a > > web services platform if such functions were built into PHP's > > base release... but, right now, PEAR::SOAP seems to have more > > features and more developer support, and does not require PHP to > > be recompiled, so it is the natural choice. > > > > Best, > > > > Chris. > > C would be nice. I floating towards mixed C/PHP script for ease of > development and maintainability (more PHP script developers around to > provide patches etc.). With the new xml capabilities in PHP 5, combined > with Curl for transports, most of the heavy processing should happen at > the C level. A couple new C level functions might be needed to flesh > out soap support. The PHP script level should be there to provide soap > library level features, such as supporting alternate transports, > enabling extensions to soap, etc. I think with this blend we can find a > happy inbetween space that will both perform well and be highly flexible. > > Shane > > > > -- > PHP Soap Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >