Re: Re: Function naming in the procedural world

From: Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:18:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Function naming in the procedural world
References: 1 2  Groups: php.standards 
Request: Send a blank email to standards-+get-61@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
This would translate well into <?php namespace vendor\file; function functionname(){} ?> However, I wonder if you are in essence doing the exact same thing as the proposed namespace naming for OOP? i.e. {vendor}_{package}_function You just define package as the file containing the function.
Hmm, perhaps. Perhaps vendor is not the right name for our top level though. Most OSS projects only have one offering. We have Phorum. Its the project, the group, the app. All one name for all levels. Now, something like Horde could have a true vendor and package separation. Brian.

« previous php.standards (#61) next »