Re: [PHP4BETA] CVS update: php4/ext/pcre
| From: | Rasmus Lerdorf | Date: | Tue, 25 May 1999 19:48:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] CVS update: php4/ext/pcre | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-1028@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> I think having aliases when not for backwards compatibility is a bad thing
> to do. We should decide on one set of function names and stick to them.
> Personally I prefer the preg over pcre. I think it'll be more intuitive for
> users.
I agree completely on the aliases thing. But it sort of was for backward
compatibility purposes.
We have ereg() and ereg_replace() currently. The proposal was to
introduce: preg_match() and preg_replace() where preg_match() would be
equivalent in functionality to ereg(). This is where I suggested we might
want to make an alias such that preg() did the same as preg_match() to
help the folks who would expect the preg() function to exist. I guess
not a pure backward compatibility alias, but close. I definitely wasn't
suggesting aliasing pcre_* to preg_*
-Rasmus
--
PHP 4 Beta