[PHP4BETA] More On PREG/EREG/PCRE
| From: | Boris Erdmann | Date: | Wed, 26 May 1999 13:48:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | [PHP4BETA] More On PREG/EREG/PCRE | ||
| Groups: | php.version4 | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-1065@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
As I see it we have two discussions in one:
- which naming should be used
- which default behaviour should be used
as far as we are now - would the following be a solution:
having three sets of *reg:
oreg_match |
oreg_replace |--> doing it the old way
oreg_split |
preg_match |
preg_replace |--> doing it the perl way
preg_split |
ereg_match | aliasing to whatever was
ereg_replace |--> chosen to be default at
ereg_split | compile time
ereg an alias to ereg_match
split an alias to ereg_split
This make it possible for ISPs to have a smooth
transition from the old to the new behaviour -
providing both functionalities. There will be a time
where scripts can get fixed from ereg_* to oreg_*
still providing the new functionality under preg_*.
At one point they can make a switch and from then
on ereg_* will behave like perl.
Would this be a way to go?
Boris
--
PHP 4 Beta