Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 SAPI.c SAPI.h /php4/sapi/apache mod_php4.c /php4/sapi/isapi php4isapi.c

From: Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 14:45:46 +0000
Subject: Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 SAPI.c SAPI.h /php4/sapi/apache mod_php4.c /php4/sapi/isapi php4isapi.c
References: 1  Groups: php.version4 
Request: Send a blank email to php-version4+get-11039@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Stig Bakken wrote: > Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > > zeev Fri Feb 25 21:04:11 2000 EDT > > > > Modified files: > > /php4 SAPI.c SAPI.h > > /php4/sapi/apache mod_php4.c > > /php4/sapi/isapi php4isapi.c > > Log: > > - From CODING_STANDARDS: > > [6] NEVER USE strncat(). If you're absolutely sure you know what you're > > doing, > > check its man page again, and only then, consider using it, and even then, > > try avoiding it. > > strncat() is your enemy! > > strncat() != strlcat() Ok :) I don't know what strlcat() is, but I guess it's what one would generally expect strncat() to be, so I take it back - sorry :) Anyway, I'd generally extend it to 'most str*() functions are bad', because they're slow, and if you already have more information about the data you're dealing with (lengths), you're better off working with memcpy() and exact offsets. strcpy(foo, bar); strcat(foo, baz); is much slower than memcpy(foo, bar, bar_len); memcpy(foo+bar_len, baz, baz_len); foo[bar_len+baz_len] = 0; Zeev -- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/

« previous php.version4 (#11039) next »