RTFM
| From: | Szii | Date: | Sun, 23 Apr 2000 20:32:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | RTFM | ||
| Groups: | php.version4 | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-13952@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I -did- read the f**king manual. Every damn one I could find.
php.net
phpbuilder.com
Search on Altavista/excite.
I've made posts on four(4) points.
1) Implicit "this" pointers and a requested change.
It's not going to happen, and that's fine. Nowhere could
I find that you are required to use $this-> for EVERY
member variable except one fleeting example. Which brings me
to #2...
2) Extra $ on this-> pointers. You use $ on every damn variable you
set, so why the hell not on a $this-> call? This was confusing, I
figured
it out after posting my message and brought it up. Yes, this is a beta
list. Beta means that things are not flushed out, including the docs.
Perhaps the open-source doc people are reading this list and may add
a note. IMHO, I thought this place was about collective learning. If
someone has a problem, or a stumbling point, and they post it then it
can either be documented or otherwise resolved. What's the point of
having a feature rich language if it has a HUGE learning curve full of
potholes? People will choose another language or spend a lot of wasted
time on otherwise "simple" stuff. This idea was also my post about
corrupted objects, since $this->$my_var is not $this->my_var.
3) Isset(). This one was superfluous, you're correct. I had taken the
idea of it in the context of a C++ pointer instead of it's own
"object" and
asked what the result of (isset(object_reference)) was.
4) I did have one "RTFM" post about confirming that all session-stored
objects were server-side. I was hoping that perhaps PHP had some type of
client-side store objects. That would be just too damn cool, and
would avoid my having
to write JavaScript. Is not the case, but I pointed out that this was a
confirmation in the beginning of the message.
Yes, I'm new to PHP. I've never used it before last week. I had surmised
that a PHP list such as this was for asking questions since I am using the
PHP4 beta. My transition from compiled languages to PHP has not been
easy; I'm not too keen on stateless connections after having worked with
"hard" connections for so long. Thus far, compiled languages (C, C++, Ada,
Pascal) and VB have been easier to learn than PHP4. Even COM/DCOM
gave me less headaches. Just my observation after one hell of a long week.
Regardless, my apologies for the "noise" and I'll try to keep my questions
to myself and just lurk.
-Szii
Comments welcome, flames sent to /dev/null.
At 01:56 AM 4/23/00 -0700, you wrote:
>
>Sorry, but RTFM!!
>Do you homework before coming to the list.
>I don't mean to knock you, but seriously, the things you've
>been clogging the list with are easily resolved by a quick
>visit to php.net or a search at google.
>Thanks.
>
>> All better now.... anyone else think this might be a good thing to be in
the
>> doc? Maybe we can get a design alias on the resolution of $ such that when
>> resolving $ it strips out "extra" $'s?
>
>