Re: [PHP4BETA] Something else wrong with previous example?
| From: | Joey | Date: | Fri, 05 May 2000 16:24:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] Something else wrong with previous example? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-14533@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Sorry, you got in between two emails.
--Joey Smith
Please forgive the long sig:
*** Notice To Bulk Emailers: Attention! Pursuant to US Code, Title 47,
Chapter 5, Subchapter II, 227, any & all unsolicited commercial e-mail
sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the
amount of the $1500 US and copies will be forwarded to domain
administrators. Emailing denotes acceptance of said terms!
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> On Fri, 05 May 2000, Joey wrote:
> > Hmm, on further inspection, I am getting a SIGSEGV even /with/ the second
> > arg being proper.
> >
> > The real problem was trying to get php to execute <FOO>.
> > Failed executing:
> > <FOO>
> > FATAL: emalloc(): Unable to allocate 719891025 bytes
> >
> > Not sure what that is all about. Obviously I did /not/ want to eval <FOO>,
> > I was just simplifing a earlier failure, but why does this SIGSEGV?
>
> Like I said, stay tuned.
>
> -Andrei
>
> Documentation is worth it just to be able
> to answer all your mail with 'RTFM'. -- Alan Cox
>