Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: php4 / main.c php.h
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Fri, 02 Jun 2000 16:07:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: php4 / main.c php.h | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-16096@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
So why don't you leave it as user_error(). I really hate seeing two functions that do the same just for backwards compatibility reasons, especially if it is quite a new function. Do we need the new name? We can put a big note about it when we release 4.0.1
Andi
At 04:25 PM 6/2/00 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I'd be very happy to nuke it, but as it was advertised in the NEWS file, I'm not sure you can rely on nobody using it. What do you mean by us changing the couple of places where it was used? Do you have access to all of the PHP 4.0.0 sites on the net? :) Zeev On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Andi Gutmans wrote: Why leave user_error() for compatibility? I don't think anyone really used it. If so, we can change the couple of places where they did. Andi --- Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/ -- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/--- Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/