Re: [PHP4BETA] Priority of compiler warnings?

From: Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 20:18:00 +0000
Subject: Re: [PHP4BETA] Priority of compiler warnings?
References: 1  Groups: php.version4 
Request: Send a blank email to php-version4+get-1932@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 01:56:05PM -0600, Joey wrote: > I have a _bunch_ of new "warnings", although it compiles > fine... > > Do we care about these? Where do the fit in the "grand > scheme"? (ie, "fix after beta 1", or something?). We will probably have to disable -Wstrict-prototypes since the ZTS system requires some prototypes to look like #define PSLS_D static void php_rshutdown_session_globals(PSLS_D) { ... } (just an example, there are many other) gcc interprets these as if we simply missed to declare the function properly and spits out a warning. There are some other warnings generated by new code. The authors of the respective code parts probably know about it, and will hopefully "fix" it. Everyone who is eager to see all warnings should compile with --enable-debug --enable-maintainer-mode > Also, is the TODO file up to date? Which one? -- Regards, Sascha Schumann Consultant

« previous php.version4 (#1932) next »