Re: [PHP4BETA] Re: convert_to_string_ex is not the solution.
| From: | Joey | Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 1999 22:06:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] Re: convert_to_string_ex is not the solution. | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-4594@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I really think this is the only weird thing I did...except for using
$array[index] instead of $array["index"], but that one already bit me in
going to 3.0.12...
--Joey Smith
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Joey wrote:
>
> > >
> > > i know a few people - including myself - who add a '&' here and there
> > > in
> > > my scripts to speed things up. and yes, i've got bitten by funtions that
> > > changed variable-types around without me expecting them to do so.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > If you _DO_ decide to change this behavior, it should definitely go into
> > the incompat list. I have actually used this as an undocumented feature...
> > by calling strlen() on something passed by ref., I programmed some thing
> > to then expect a str.
>
> debugging code written that way must be an adventure! really, if we
> decide to keep it or not - you should never depend on such undocumneted
> things. so you're saying that you're using strlen as
> "convert_to_string_and_return_size()" ? whoaaaa...
>
> there are minor incompatible things in 3<->4 (as noted) - but if your code
> depends on this kind of stuff you'll have a hard time going to 4.0.
>
> hmmm,
> tc
>
>
> >
> > I agree, it should _NOT_ have been happening, but bcz it did, I programmed
> > around it...perhaps others did also...
> >
> >
> > --
> > PHP 4 Beta
> >
> >
>
>
> Thies C. Arntzen "One Big-Mac, Small Fries and a Coke!"
> Digital Collections Phone +49 40 235350 Fax +49 40 23535180
> Hammerbrookstr. 93 20097 Hamburg / Germany
>
>
> --
> PHP 4 Beta
>
>