Re: [PHP4BETA] Re: HTTP_FDF_DATA do we really need it??

From: Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 10:20:36 +0000
Subject: Re: [PHP4BETA] Re: HTTP_FDF_DATA do we really need it??
References: 1  Groups: php.version4 
Request: Send a blank email to php-version4+get-5265@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Uwe Steinmann wrote: > On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:09:52AM +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote: > > hi uwe, > > > > just fixed a "HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA" issue - and grepped thru all sources for > > "HTTP_FDF_DATA" - it seems to me it's never actually used (exept in > > post.c). > > > > can't the FDF stuff just live from "HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA" - i think that > > would be a cleaner solution. > Actually I wouldn't mind, if we don't mind to sacrifice PHP3 compatibility. > > But, don't we at least need the extra content type in > supported_post_content_types[]? no - if php does not understand the context it will just create HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA (afaik). tc > > Uwe > -- > Uwe.Steinmann@fernuni-hagen.de > Tel: +2331 987 4528 Fax: +2331 987 375 > > -- > PHP 4 Beta > > Thies C. Arntzen "One Big-Mac, Small Fries and a Coke!" Digital Collections Phone +49 40 235350 Fax +49 40 23535180 Hammerbrookstr. 93 20097 Hamburg / Germany

« previous php.version4 (#5265) next »