Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 main.c /php4/ext/odbc php_odbc.c /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.c info.c info.h
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Tue, 21 Dec 1999 21:40:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] cvs: /php4 main.c /php4/ext/odbc php_odbc.c /php4/ext/standard basic_functions.c info.c info.h | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-8350@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 23:38 21/12/1999 , Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Zeev Suraski wrote:Personally I think the ChangeLog is cluttered anyway, and adding the @'s messages in there aren't going to make much of a difference. As far as I recall, my NEWS (i.e. the old ChangeLog) notices were almost always identical to my commit messages, except for perhaps the name in parentheses. I'm for adding the whole thing to the ChangeLog file. Zeev -- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/Because ChangeLog ends up with an empty log line.No no no.. Why don't @ lines end up in the ChangeLog? Because, @ lines are intended for NEWS which means that they should have a news notice. Most times, the ChangeLog message is going to be different... I don't know, a few people thought all this was a good idea back when we discussed it. Now I don't know, let's just reach consensus.