Re: [PHP4BETA] Performance question
| From: | David Munsey-Kano | Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:38:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PHP4BETA] Performance question | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.version4 |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-version4+get-8376@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I have ColdFusion on NT and PHP3 on Digital Unix (an Alpha). Sorry, but
I don't know the specifics about the hardware configurations. However,
the benchmarks on the Zend website were quite helpful. I am looking
forward to the release of php version 4!
Is the beta 4 release fairly stable at this point? Is it as easy to
build from source as php3, with a configure script, compatible as a
built-in module of apache 1.3.6, etc.?
rasmus@php.net wrote:
>
> > Hi! I am new to this list and have a question. I have had some
> > experience programming ColdFusion and PHP3 and the performance (at least
> > with my servers) of ColdFusion is superior. How much better is the
> > performance of PHP version 4 as compared to PHP3? I am doing Oracle
> > database programming.
>
> What type of server are you on? NT? If so, you are comparing apples and
> oranges. Try PHP on a Unix server. PHP 4 will provide better performance
> on NT, but with PHP 3 the Windows version is really just for prototyping
> applications. PHP 3 on Windows (and NT itself if you want my opinion) is
> not a production quality solution. PHP 4 attempts to become production
> quality even on Windows and you should try out the ISAPI version if you
> want to do comparisons on NT.
>
> -Rasmus
--
David Munsey-Kano
Dartmouth College
(603) 646-1320
The world is full of zanies and fools, who don't believe in sensible
rules, and don't believe what sensible people say, and because these
daft and dewey-eyed dolts keep building up impossible hopes, impossible
things keep happening everyday!