Re: [PHP4BETA] Shared modules

From: Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:34:24 +0000
Subject: Re: [PHP4BETA] Shared modules
Groups: php.version4 
Request: Send a blank email to php-version4+get-8570@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Rasmus wrote: >I think the holy grail here is the ability to build a shared extension by >itself without actually building all of PHP For now, I would settle for being consistently able to build a shared extension after actually building all of PHP. My ext/java has been intermittently broken on Unix on a fairly regular basis. In many cases the problems go away by themselves, so I'm not very worried. In other cases, the fixes have been straightforward. For the first time, ext/java is broken on Windows. The problem has to do with the way that Windows handles DLLs. Inside of one of the functions, there is a call to what was once ALLOC_PVAL. This has been changed to ALLOC_ZVAL. ALLOC_ZVAL is a macro which invokes a macro which invokes ALS_FETCH (another macro) which accesses global data (alloc_globals_id). The rules of Windows DLLs prevent direct accessing of global data from another DLL without a lot of special incantations - in fact, the generally accepted practice is to only access such data through specially exported functions, encapsualted via mechanisms like PHPAPI. My reason for bringing this up is not to whine (though I would appreciate it if Zeev and/or Andi would take a look into this...<grin>). My real point is that if this is the holy grail, then something more substantial than some non-mainstream extension needs to be routinely built as a separate shared library/DLL. Food for thought.

« previous php.version4 (#8570) next »