Re: The php.net documentation system

From: Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:47:14 +0000
Subject: Re: The php.net documentation system
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.webmaster 
Request: Send a blank email to php-webmaster+get-10758@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 19:31, Sophie Gautier <gautier.sophie@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Hannes, > On 27/03/2011 20:23, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:36, Duncan Lithgow<duncan.lithgow@gmail.com> >>  wrote: >>> >>> Hi there, we are looking into the options for running multilingual >>> help documentation. Could you tell us something about your system? >>> >>> >> >> We use DocBook5[1], which is edited either with normal XML editors or >> PhD OE[2], and rendered with PhD[3]. >> We use a lot of entity magic to simplify often used phrases, and >> revision checking to verify translations. >> We have relatively strict skeletons[4] for all typical things we write >> about, just to keep consistency. >> >> In retrospective we should probably have used pootle[5] or >> transifex[6] (or something along that way) for translations, but they >> never really could handle our docbook files though. >> >> After PhD OE came along, we are quite happy with our system though, >> even though we have had to re-implement the entire Docbook toolchain >> (mostly for performance reasons) by now : > > We are currently using Pootle and update the wiki with the files, so, > nothing new under the sun I guess ;-) Our needs go a bit further then viewing docs online. We generate CHM files, Unix man pages, ePub, PDF, html, json for IDEs... :] The wiki formats really cannot handle all the semantics we need our markup to do. If you have no such needs, then I suppose DocBook would be a overkill for you guys :) -Hannes

« previous php.webmaster (#10758) next »