Re: Re: Improving User Notes In The Manual -- First Steps
| From: | Christopher Jones | Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2012 04:52:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Improving User Notes In The Manual -- First Steps | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.doc php.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-webmaster+get-14676@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 09/09/2012 07:30 AM, Sherif Ramadan wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:When I read statements like that, my instinct tells me that the feature isn't needed. The ongoing maintenance of new features is a weak area for the PHP community so let's only do things that are really needed. Chris -- christopher.jones@oracle.com http://twitter.com/#!/ghrdOk. But why then all the different options? If a note is flagged, the expected outcome is for an admin to delete it - after verifying that the note is broken. There isn't any reason for the user to jump through hoops and buttons to tell us why, we need to read the note anyway. In my mind, that means flagging is another way of "mark as bad note".. which effectively is what a note with down votes is too, and the end result is the same; note removed. -HannesI understand what you're saying and I've been back and forth about whether or not they're both worthwhile or not.