Re: PHP.net Website Problem: age of posts

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Mike Griffiths <mgriffiths@gmail.com>wrote: > I agree, there are lots of instances where this is a very bad idea, > especially when you consider the number of user notes which seem to be > replies to other notes but not referenced as such. > PHP user contributed notes is not a forum or a discussion board. Notes that reply to other notes for the sake of dialogue is normally discouraged and should not be standard by which we display our notes. > > Mike (mikemike) > > > On 17 January 2013 14:44, Booksort <info@booksort.com> wrote: > > > Why have you changed to label posts as eg '1 year ago'? > > When reading User Contributed Notes and code suggestions on the site, it > > is often essential to know exactly what order they were written in. This > is > > now impossible. > > Especially when it seems the order of display can be voted for! > > This seems like dumbing-down in the extreme, to cater for people who > can't > > work out in their heads that 17th January 2012 is a year ago. > > > > Please count this as a vote against it! > > Ian > > > > -- > > PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > -- > > Mike Griffiths > > mgriffiths@gmail.com >