Req #44763 [Ver]: Disable user contributed notes on aliases

From: Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:04:24 +0000
Subject: Req #44763 [Ver]: Disable user contributed notes on aliases
References: 1  Groups: php.webmaster 
Request: Send a blank email to php-webmaster+get-26867@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44763&edit=1 ID: 44763 Updated by: cmb@php.net Reported by: rrf5000 at psu dot edu Summary: Disable user contributed notes on aliases Status: Verified Type: Feature/Change Request Package: Website problem PHP Version: Irrelevant Block user comment: N Private report: N New Comment: The reason I posted this comment was that I stumbled upon user note 117236[1] which suggest to add a see also link to date_create_from_format. My first thought was, yes of course, but actually, DateTime::__construct() already links to DateTime::createFromFormat(), and both methods already document their procedural counterparts. I have not thought about aliases like chop(), which are not even mentioned in the docs they're aliasing (rtrim() in this case). This could, however, be changed, e.g. by adding a second methodsynopsis to rtrim.xml which shows chop(). Then a redirect from function.chop.php to function.rtrim.php appears to be fine. [1] <http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.date-create.php#117236> Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2018-03-17 05:28:04] sobak@php.net @cmb I agree that would simplify implementing the requested behavior but at the same time I think it would end up terribly unclear to the manual users. We already have a bunch URL redirects (e.g. for the legacy pages) and I'd myself never think that redirect may indicate an alias. We need to remember that clicking link on the menu is not the only way people browse the manual. I often simply go with php.net/[function] and even ignoring that I believe we should stay explicit about documented features. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2018-03-16 23:26:13] cmb@php.net Can't we "just" redirect the alias pages to the "real thing" instead? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2008-07-20 22:20:36] bjori@php.net Although it is a good idea I don't think our infrastructure can support it... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2008-04-17 15:14:56] rrf5000 at psu dot edu Description: ------------ This is a documentation suggestion, not a bug report. I've noticed more than a few times that users will contribute notes on an alias function's reference page (e.g., Array function sizeof() ) which are already documented on the aliased function's reference page (i.e., Array function count() ). I think that it would make more sense to keep the sets of notes the same across the page of aliases and their aliased function, or disable notes on alias pages to keep duplicate examples and notes from occurring. I believe that this will keep things cleaner in the long run, especially for users wanting to peruse the function notes and editors cleaning up the notes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44763&edit=1

« previous php.webmaster (#26867) next »