Civilocity

Dear Php, Please read this slow and when it settles in with you I would like to speak to you about it. I realize it's importance and think its necessary to send it to other leaders around the world. Would Americans be safer watching the leader of Russia the entire time that person is in power in a democracy? Would Russians be safer? The same goes for any country would Americans be safer watching the leader of China the entire time that person is in office? Would Chinese be safer? The head professors in the philosophy department at GWU (Washington DC) and UCL (London) have both replied that teaching civilocity would not occur without more experience yet knowledge is not experience its fate. I reluctantly must opinionate that they are making great mistakes and both should persuade their common councils that not having a college course on civilocity taught by me, who wrote it, would be a great tragedy to the intelligence of the college level students let alone the population. What is a debate without the discussion of Civilocity; the benefits and disadvantages of 'watching the person whom you voted to power in a democracy the entire time that person is in service to you?' Any senator, representative, or person opposed of civilocity is asking not to know the full story. Is a better educated society a better society? A candidate not running on civilocity will not have the peoples best interest at heart. The difference between an open society and civilocity is that, in an open society there would be no intelligence agencies. Surely there is a loss of intelligence that is at the college level and that is present in my writing which needs to be addressed. Thus having the correct experience and diploma is surely imperious to the knowledge of civilocity and I must reconcile our differences and urge you to emphasize the importance that civilocity brings. Civilocity must be treated like a candidate with no chance to lose because it contains no deadline, its inevitable. A world instating civilocity means no two countries will be at war. tick tock tick tock and there was a knock I looked to my left and then to my right and realized I have been sleeping all night I sprang out of bed with an idea in my head and this is what I said. Do you invest in scientist to cure a disease? How about curing war between nations, the one disease no scientist ever cured, no doctor ever saved, and no religion ever stopped? This is going to change the world more than a certain candidate of color or gender, a scientist curing a disease, a doctor curing a patient, a religion of peace, or a movement for one sect of people to vote. The person who fights for civilocity will be seen as Martin Luther King Jr., Malcom X, or even Plato. Civilocity is as real as democracy. The greatest idea in politics since democracy was introduced. Now think about the 4000 soldiers who died in Iraq and what they were fighting for and the real answer is democracy instead of a horrible tyrant that wouldn’t be able to achieve power in a country when civilocity is instated saving 4000 american lives. The error is that its still not talked about on tv and that’s the american intelligence not doing a damn thing to save a life. The second an economy goes in debt as a country we need to raise taxes and collect more money. A government doesnt know the value of time because a government isnt living thats why knowledge and change is suppressed which is inevitable like democracy, woman voting, and African Americans voting. People are the ones who must take responsibility for change and step up to the government. People are the ones who must speak of change to the masses in a manner to address the most citizens in a peaceful way immediately unless the people will be a body like the government who aren't living. "Is democracy more true than heaven, is civilocity more true than god?" Nathaniel I. Wenger 128 S. 11th St. Apt. 3F Philadelphia, PA 19107 484-571-4411 admin@dimends.com http://www.civilocity.com