Req #77452 [Csd]: Issue tracker: Undefined status "Wont fix"
| From: | chealer at gmail dot com | Date: | Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:45:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Req #77452 [Csd]: Issue tracker: Undefined status "Wont fix" | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-webmaster+get-29847@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=77452&edit=1
ID: 77452
User updated by: chealer at gmail dot com
Reported by: chealer at gmail dot com
Summary: Issue tracker: Undefined status "Wont fix"
Status: Closed
Type: Feature/Change Request
Package: Website problem
PHP Version: Irrelevant
Assigned To: petk
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
Thank you Tiffany, but what do you mean by "closing a bug"?
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-07-25 16:50:32] tiffany@php.net
> can you clarify what "the closing comment" refers to?
When a bug is closed as "wont fix" a comment by the person closing the bug is submitted
explaining why the bug was closed. Hence, it's a "closing comment."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-07-25 16:41:56] chealer at gmail dot com
Thank you Peter, but your addition starts with a closing LI tag, rather than an opening one, causing
the HTML to be invalid and the item to display as part of the previous one.
Also, can you clarify what "the closing comment" refers to?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2019-05-04 11:45:47] petk@php.net
Automatic comment on behalf of peterkokot@gmail.com
Revision: http://git.php.net/?p=web/bugs.git;a=commit;h=98337280da29ac042159c2280895d0b4ec753a01
Log: Fix #77452: Undefined status Wont fix
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2019-01-27 15:50:04] chealer at gmail dot com
cmb@php.net wrote:
> > Undefined status "Wont fix"
>
> I do not really understand this request. âWont fixâ means âwon't
> fixâ, and that means that the PHP developers won't fix an issue
> (even though it is acknowlegded as such), for reasons to be stated
> in the closing comment.
What do you mean by closing comment? In any case, I have seen that status used on mere RFE-s (not
bugs), so if that's the intended usage, there should probably be a note about the real-world
usage too. I don't see how a developer could predict with certitude that a certain issue will
not be fixed though.
[...]
> > some statuses are also probably not needed anymore and are left
> > from the past...
>
> From what I can tell, all statuses still are needed (maybe
> âcriticalâ should be a separate field, though).
I probably agree that "Critical" should not be a status; I filed ticket #77528 to clarify
that status.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2019-01-16 23:12:11] petk@php.net
See the list of statuses also here:
https://bugs.php.net/search.php
I guess, it's pretty synced actually, yes. So, except that there are 0 critical bugs, and that
the "old feedback" doesn't work like this anymore, because the cron job is too fast
for it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=77452
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=77452&edit=1