Re: PHP / WinNT 4.0 / Apache - what is most stabile?
| From: | Rasmus Lerdorf | Date: | Wed, 27 Mar 2002 16:03:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP / WinNT 4.0 / Apache - what is most stabile? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.windows |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-windows+get-12784@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Why don't you test the different versions and let us know which is more
stable. On Windows stability is a very subjective thing.
-Rasmus
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Alan McKay wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This is kind of frustrating.
>
> I'm reading the install.txt and near the top it explains about the 2 versions,
> those being PHP.EXE and the SAPI modules. It then says that the SAPI
> version is not considered production grade, and is still unstable
> "especially on platforms older than W2K".
>
> Then later on in the same document it says :
>
> "Now that version 4.1 introduces a safer sapi module, we recommend
> that you configure PHP as a module in Apache."
>
> OK, so which is it? I am to be using this in a commercial product, and
> absolutely have to have the most stabile version. I'd prefer to run the
> SAPIs because they are apparantly faster, but the document contradicts
> itself on which is most stabile.
>
> Can someone help clarify this? (And if someone responsible for that
> document is listening, could you please update it accordingly?)
>
> thanks,
> -Alan
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>