Re: Apache...

Oh. And use the SAPI (Apache module) version if you can. This provides better performance over the CGI version and allows you to do some things that the CGI version cannot (such as adding relative paths after the script itself). --- Seairth Jacobs seairth@seairth.com "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@seairth.com> wrote in message news:20020821144510.54882.qmail@pb1.pair.com... > I agree. I have seen several mentions that PHP 4.3 should have greatly > improved support for Apache2. However, I would stick with 1.3.x until it > has been released and shown to be stable. :) > > --- > Seairth Jacobs > seairth@seairth.com > > > "Rich Gray" <richardgray@onetel.co.uk> wrote in message > news:KOENJGNHGACBDCEIKHKAGECLCLAA.richardgray@onetel.co.uk... > > Brian > > > > FWIW I had major problems getting PHP to run with Apache 2.x on NT4.0 - I > > had to revert back to v1.3.x ... > > > > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian McGarvie [mailto:brian.mcgarvie@anypurposeloans.co.uk] > > Sent: 21 August 2002 13:25 > > To: php-windows@lists.php.net > > Subject: [PHP-WIN] Apache... > > > > > > What version of Apache is reccomened at present with PHP (cgi or isapi) to > > run on a production webserver on windows? > > > > > > > > -- > > PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > >