RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: Question about emalloc
| From: | Mikey | Date: | Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:04:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: Question about emalloc | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.windows |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-windows+get-16439@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> The result is efreed in that case. RETURN_STRINGL is a macro that assigns
> result to return_value and return_value is implicitly efreed by PHP.
> That's the only reason you are not getting a warning in that case. For
> other stuff that you emalloc but don't assign to return_value, you will
> get a warning if you do not efree it.
>
> -Rasmus
OK, thanks for clearing this up for me guys :-)
I reckon I might have to check this O'Reilly book out though...
regards,
Mikey