Re: R: [PHP-WIN] best php editor?
| From: | HKG) | Date: | Wed, 05 Nov 2003 11:42:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: R: [PHP-WIN] best php editor? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.windows |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-windows+get-21994@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Aha, I see your point, the windows update/refresh speed.
But that's a bottleneck most interpreted languages has.
A GUI written in VB is terrible for instance. But I
wasn't aware that Java generally was that "bad" to?
Anyhow, I agree that it is indeed annoying with a slow
editor, but my question was about what possible could
be the point with a fast editor?
In my opinion an editor just need to be sufficient fast,
in other words "not slow".
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 12:29, Francesco wrote:
> I meant: try an editor written in Java. All applications I tried written in
> Java were paintakingsly slow. And I know many editors are written with it.
> "B.A.T. Svensson" ha scritto nel messaggio
> > I don't do development with Java, nor UltraEdit, so please enlighten me.
> >
> > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 12:05, Francesco wrote:
> > > Try something written in Java, then you tell me...
> > >
> > > "B.A.T. Svensson" <> ha scritto nel messaggio
> > > > Why do a text editor need to be fast???
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 17:33, Francesco wrote:
> > > > > Or Ultraedit. Super-fast.
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Messaggio originale-----
> > > > > Da: Luis Moreira [mailto:]
> > > > > Inviato: martedi 4 novembre 2003 17.28
> > > > > A: Disko_kex; 'Bobo Wieland'; php-windows@lists.php.net
> > > > > Oggetto: Re: [PHP-WIN] best php editor?
> > > > >
> > > > > There is also PHPEDIT and TEXTPAD (this one at
> http://www.textpad.com/)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Luis
> > > > >