Re: R: [PHP-WIN] best php editor?

From: Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 11:42:48 +0000
Subject: Re: R: [PHP-WIN] best php editor?
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.windows 
Request: Send a blank email to php-windows+get-21994@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Aha, I see your point, the windows update/refresh speed. But that's a bottleneck most interpreted languages has. A GUI written in VB is terrible for instance. But I wasn't aware that Java generally was that "bad" to? Anyhow, I agree that it is indeed annoying with a slow editor, but my question was about what possible could be the point with a fast editor? In my opinion an editor just need to be sufficient fast, in other words "not slow". On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 12:29, Francesco wrote: > I meant: try an editor written in Java. All applications I tried written in > Java were paintakingsly slow. And I know many editors are written with it. > "B.A.T. Svensson" ha scritto nel messaggio > > I don't do development with Java, nor UltraEdit, so please enlighten me. > > > > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 12:05, Francesco wrote: > > > Try something written in Java, then you tell me... > > > > > > "B.A.T. Svensson" <> ha scritto nel messaggio > > > > Why do a text editor need to be fast??? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 17:33, Francesco wrote: > > > > > Or Ultraedit. Super-fast. > > > > > > > > > > -----Messaggio originale----- > > > > > Da: Luis Moreira [mailto:] > > > > > Inviato: martedi 4 novembre 2003 17.28 > > > > > A: Disko_kex; 'Bobo Wieland'; php-windows@lists.php.net > > > > > Oggetto: Re: [PHP-WIN] best php editor? > > > > > > > > > > There is also PHPEDIT and TEXTPAD (this one at > http://www.textpad.com/) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Luis > > > > >

« previous php.windows (#21994) next »