Re: Re: Emailing via mail(), secondary servers
| From: | Ignatius Reilly | Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:40:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Emailing via mail(), secondary servers | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.windows |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-windows+get-22906@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Although this conversation has by now undoubtedly accrued to human
knowledge, there may be other more suitable forums where to pursue it.
Ignatius
_________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Patrin" <papercrane@reversefold.com>
To: <php-windows@lists.php.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 23:32
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: Emailing via mail(), secondary servers
> Manuel Lemos wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 02/18/2004 06:40 PM, Justin Patrin wrote:
> >
> >>>>> The main point of requiring a valid address has nothing to
> >>>>> do with sending you spam, but rather to make it difficult
> >>>>> for some authors to boost their top download ranking
> >>>>> positions by creating many accounts and download their own
> >>>>> packages. That is explained in the why page.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> And that's of course what indvidual with low moral will do when
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If you study a little about the human nature you will realize that
> >>> tehre would be people capable of doing that and much worse. If you
> >>> just think of people with great needs to satisfy their egos at the
> >>> cost of getting exposure to their names it is not hard to understand.
> >>> It is not wrong to desire to obtain recognition. What is wrong is to
> >>> commit fraud to obtain undeserved recognition.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Of course, this is what happens when you have "top" sites. Any
> >> "top"
> >> site you look at has cheating in it. IMHO, you shouldn't be using the
> >> "most downloaded" thing as that's real easy to fix.
> >
> >
> > Definetely you are not very skilled in addressing the needs of
> > communities of capable individuals.
> >
>
> Why do you insist on simply saying I know nothing. Why not discuss or
> explain rather than make character attacks? You still have not given me
> any concrete reasons for anything you say.
>
> > I am not going to bother to explain why, but the existence of that top
> > is one of the reasons that motivates so many developers to contribute to
> > the PHP Classes site. The fact that only downloads done by authenticated
> > users count for the tops is the one of the reasons why most developers
> > that contribute to the site do not lift the login requirement to
download.
> >
>
> --
> paperCrane <Justin Patrin>
>
> --
> PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>