Re: Question about PHP on Win2k Advanced Server
| From: | John Lim | Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:56:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Question about PHP on Win2k Advanced Server | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.windows |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-windows+get-23468@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
FastCGI provides the best reliability on Windows. It's as close to 99.99% as
you can get. Zend has a commercial windows enabler built on FastCGI at
http://zend.com
There is also a free FastCGI installer at http://php.weblogs.com/easywindows
which i wrote.
Regards, John
"Anthony M. Saffer" <anthonysaffer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:008f01c42306$0fe10e80$63e6b8d1@saffer1...
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I'm currently working on an application for a social service agency and I
> was writing it with a LAMP target. I was informed on yesterday that LAMP
> will not be the target but rather Win2k Advanced Server. I thought "no
> problem" since I know that PHP can run on both Linux and Windows and
figured
> my application would be fine. But then, after doing some research, I found
> that PHP seems to not be terribly reliable on Windows and it gave me
pause.
> This application MUST have a near 24/7 uptime and I cannot afford to have
> PHP crashing in the middle of things. So, I am seriously considering using
> ASP to do this since 1) it's native to Windows and stable and 2) it's
> tightly integrated.
>
> What does everyone think of PHP on Windows? IS it stable enough to be
nearly
> 100% reliable? What are the problems with using PHP on Windows?
>
> Thanks,
> Anthony M. Saffer