RE: [ZEND-ENGINE-CVS] cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_compile.c php-src/tests/classes ctor_in_interface_01.phpt ctor_in_interface_02.phpt
ctor_in_interface_03.phpt ctor_in_interface_04.phpt interface_construct.phpt

Marcus, Don't roll it back. I just like make one note. If class implements interface with constructor then all its subclasses may not change constructor's prototype. If this is OK for all, then I haven't any other objections to the pacth. Please invite me into IRC, if you will discussing something releated to ZE and/or PHP language not in @internals. (I am available in MSN, but not always able to look for IRC discussions). Thanks. Dmitry. > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:helly@php.net] > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 10:54 AM > To: Dmitry Stogov > Cc: zend-engine-cvs@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [ZEND-ENGINE-CVS] cvs: ZendEngine2 / > zend_compile.c php-src/tests/classes > ctor_in_interface_01.phpt ctor_in_interface_02.phpt > ctor_in_interface_03.phpt ctor_in_interface_04.phpt > interface_construct.phpt > > > Hello Dmitry, > > Monday, March 6, 2006, 8:29:50 AM, you wrote: > > > Hi Marcus, > > > Is it your answer to my "break label" patch? :( > > Well that would be funny or childish even :-) > > > I didn't see final PDM's decision about constructor in > interfaces. And > > I didn't see any discussion about this, however may be I missed it. > > It was discussed once more on IRC and thus i simply put it > here. Since it is a one line patch it can easily be dropped > out again if there's a majority of people who are against this. > > > The question about constructors in interfaces is not > simple, and both > > points of view make sense. So I would like to see your and others > > arguments? > > To me this makes perfect sense becuase there is no other way > of enforcing a signature for class constructors. On one hand > this is good because as we discussed a while back > constructors should not have to inherit the signature. > However having a way to reenforce this allows to write > dynamic factories and stuff alike where a certain signature > is important. > > Best regards, > Marcus > > >