Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Reorganization and splitting
| From: | Wez Furlong | Date: | Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:59:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Reorganization and splitting | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | svn.migration |
| Request: | Send a blank email to svn-migration+get-114@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Want != need... what's the technical reason for having multiple repos?
--Wez.
On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Wez Furlong wrote:Why do any modules need their own repo?PEAR, PECL, and GTK all want their own, for three examples.On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:48 PM, Gwynne Raskind wrote:-- Gwynne, Daughter of the Code "This whole world is an asylum for the incurable."In order to progress further on the SVN conversion, I need to know how many projects need separate repositories from php-src, and the purpose and active status of *all* the current CVS modules. The complete list of current CVS modules is appended to the end of this e-mail. Anyone with status information on them, please step forward and let me know. And anyone who knows which projects need to be their own SVN repository, instead of merged with that of php-src, also please let me know.