Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Github or not?

I'm relatively ambivalent; my experience with git so far has been fairly minimal and unsatisfactory (finding a way to just download a tarball of the source seems "difficult" to me in the git web frontends I've visited). I know this is just me being unfamiliar with it though. If I had to pick between svn and git, I would choose svn because it's more of a known entity for me. I don't have enough technical understanding of git to make a properly objective comparison. svn: +1 git: +0 (not opposed, but not rooting for it) --Wez. On Apr 3, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

We have seen little movement on anything for a while. Could I get a simple yay/nay on moving things forward with Github? No need for long-winded diatribes, just a gut-feeling yay or nay either way is fine. If we do decide to go down this road, we will need to think quite a bit about how we map our current workflow to Github. I think this would include an easy to follow page on how you do common things with git and github, and perhaps even some screencasts. There are 35 subscribers here. We have only heard from a handful so far. Hoping for a few more responses this time. -Rasmus --SVN Migration Project Mailing List (http://svn.php.net) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php