Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Argh!
| From: | Jani Taskinen | Date: | Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:09:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Argh! | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | svn.migration |
| Request: | Send a blank email to svn-migration+get-434@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Herman Radtke wrote:
Thanks. :)She was saying that this is not how svn is usually organized, but looking around I see other large projects doing that.As a svn user, the current layout is intuitive to me.. However, the svn book discusses the KDE repository layout as a valid and common one. It is just not the layout they recommend. Link here: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.reposadmin.planning.html#svn.reposadmin.projects.chooselayout
Is there still serious consideration about restructuring the layout?I sure hope so, this layout is nothing even close being intuitive and for certain parts it doesn't fit at all. f.e. those which don't need anything but "trunk". Like the web stuff.. For php-src current layout works fine. Nice to get all branches with one checkout. :) --Jani