Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Fwd: Nearly 1000 authors to php.net
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:57:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Fwd: Nearly 1000 authors to php.net | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | svn.migration |
| Request: | Send a blank email to svn-migration+get-568@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 22:09, Rasmus Lerdorf<rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 16:30, Rasmus Lerdorf<rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
>>> Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 00:36, Gwynne Raskind<gwynne@darkrainfall.org> wrote:
>>>>>> There are 343 users in global_avail which have never committed and 271
>>>>>> authors not present in global_avail.
>>>> Some of those 271 are probably listed in the pear file.
>>>>
>>>> As people need to "verify" their accounts to get access to SVN we can
>>>> quite easily see who use their accounts and who don't.
>>>> Then in 6months or so, kill off any unverified accounts...
>>> Keep in mind that we use it as our general auth mechanism, so there are
>>> people who have accounts who do not need svn access, but do need to be
>>> able to log in to edit notes, for example.
>>
>> Meaning you want to split the database into "needs svn" and "needs other
>> stuff"?
>> Guess we could disable svn access, but keep the account, for anyone
>> who hasn't committed anything in couple of years.
>
> I see no real benefit to deleting accounts. What problem does it solve?
Other then totally random people who do not work on the project being
able to retrieve MAGIC_COOKIE, and being able inject malicious code at
will?
Nothing really. The account approval process has been very strict over
the years and only trusted persons have access to important things...
-Hannes