Re: Proposing a new extension : Autoload

From: Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:14:18 +0000
Subject: Re: Proposing a new extension : Autoload
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.pecl.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pecl-dev+get-4976@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Dec 12, 2007 11:05 AM, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 10:44 -0500, Pedram Nimreezi wrote: > > How about Autobloat!? > > One man's tool is another man's bloat. Doesn't seem a particularly > reasonable name given that there is a multitude of modules many, many > PHP developers don't use. > There are millions of modules and thousands of workarounds..and... dozens of quality modules . This is a wonderful project and I +1 it all the way... In fact, PHK should replace Pear and AutoMapper (or whatever the hell it gets called) should be already present in the Engine... The joke infact is that RIGHT NOW, include_once, require_once, include, require IS autobloat.. You'd think projects like Zend::Framework would notice (as they incessantly copy Java) that they should copy at least *some* of the basic optimizations that power the design patterns. > Cheers, > Rob. > -- > ........................................................... > SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com > > Leveraging the buying power of the masses! > ........................................................... > > !DSPAM:47600466297866491211187! > > -- ~ Pedram Nimreezi Senior Programmer / Frameworkologist mc@majorcomputing.com | pedram@5g.com -- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams

« previous php.pecl.dev (#4976) next »