Re: Proposing a new extension : Autoload

On Dec 12, 2007 12:19 PM, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 12:14 -0500, Pedram Nimreezi wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2007 11:05 AM, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 10:44 -0500, Pedram Nimreezi wrote: > > > > How about Autobloat!? > > > > > > One man's tool is another man's bloat. Doesn't seem a particularly > > > reasonable name given that there is a multitude of modules many, many > > > PHP developers don't use. > > > > > There are millions of modules and thousands of workarounds..and... > > dozens of quality modules . > > > > This is a wonderful project and I +1 it all the way... > > > > In fact, PHK should replace Pear and AutoMapper (or whatever the hell > > it gets called) > > should be already present in the Engine... > > > > > > The joke infact is that RIGHT NOW, include_once, require_once, > > include, require IS autobloat.. > > Those 4 things you just mentioned serve a distinct and useful purpose. > They are are not redundant with respect to one another. > Well.. they are in fact, since I'm only (and usually) talking about performance.. include/require = SLOW, include_once,require_once = VERY SLOW > Cheers, > Rob. > -- > ........................................................... > SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com > > Leveraging the buying power of the masses! > ........................................................... > > -- > > PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- ~ Pedram Nimreezi Senior Programmer / Frameworkologist mc@majorcomputing.com | pedram@5g.com -- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams