Re: [APC-DEV] Recursive zval patch for review/comments

Gopal V wrote: > Just because zval->refcount == 0 doesn't mean apc_destroy_zval() > can automatically apc_sma_free() it. This literally corrupts > prv->next with junk from the previous zend_op and crashes happen > relatively randomly. > > The real problem is that sma_deallocate() acts rather dumb about > whether it got a valid offset to free or not. Good find Gopal. Can we try to aim for a public release in the next couple of weeks? We (and by we I mean Brian and Gopal) have added a bunch of stuff in the past couple of months with bits and pieces in use both at Yahoo and Facebook, but the public release is a bit stale. -Rasmus